Closes https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/43726
Note that the truncation strategy on the file path is not yet perfect.
I'm just applying the regular method from the label component, but we
should wrap path text from the start rather than from the end. Some time
in the future!
<img width="500" height="712" alt="Screenshot 2025-11-28 at 7 17@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6ebc618a-4b4a-42fd-b5b7-39fec3ae5335"
/>
Release Notes:
- Fixed a bug where the "Open File" button would overflow in the
multibuffer header if the file path was too long.
Follow-up to https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/39367
Release Notes:
- Fixed a small issue where a scrollbar would sometimes show in the
editor although the content fix exactly on screen.
It is easy for us to get the two fields out of sync causing weird
problems, there is no reason to have both here so.
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Co-authored by: Antonio Scandurra <antonio@zed.dev>
The bug is in the `place_near` logic, specifically the
`!row_block_types.contains_key(&(row - 1))` check. The problem isn’t
really that condition itself, but it’s that it relies on
`row_block_types`, which does not take into account that upon block
resizes, subsequent block start row moves up/down. Since `place_near`
depends on this incorrect map, it ends up causing incorrect resize syncs
to the block map, which then triggers more bad recursive calls. The
reason it worked till now in most of the cases is that recursive resizes
eventually lead to stabilizing it.
Before `place_near`, we never touched `row_block_types` during the first
prepaint pass because we knew it was based on outdated heights. Once all
heights are finalized, using it is fine.
The fix is to make sure `row_block_types` is accurate from the very
first prepaint pass by keeping an offset whenever a block shrinks or
expands. Now ideally it should take only one subsequent prepaint. But
due to shrinking, new custom/diagnostics blocks might come into the view
from below, which needs further prepaint calls for resolving. Right now,
tests pass after 2 subsequent prepaint calls. Just to be safe, we have
set it to 5.
<img width="500" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/da3d32ff-5972-46d9-8597-b438e162552b"
/>
Release Notes:
- Fix issue where sometimes Zed used to experience freeze while working
with inline diagnostics.
Reverts zed-industries/zed#42480
This panics on Nightly in cases where anchor might not be valid for that
snapshot. Taking it back before the cutoff.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This reverts commit 082b80ec89.
This broke clicking, e.g. in snippets like
```rs
let x = vec![
1, 2, //
3,
];
```
clicking between `2` and `,` is quite off now.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Closes#42191
This PR adds support for relative line numbers in deleted hunks. Note
that this only applies in cases where there is a form of relative
numbering.
It also adds some tests for this functionality as well as missing tests
for other cases in line layouting that was previously untested.
Release Notes:
- Line numbers will now be shown in deleted git hunks if relative line
numbering is enabled
#42021 Made clicking on an excerpt title toggle it. This PR brings back
the old behavior if a user is pressing the Alt key when clicking on an
excerpt title.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Remco Smits <djsmits12@gmail.com>
Supersedes https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/39910
At some point, these two (`index_for_x` and `closest_index_for_x`)
methods where separated out and some code paths used one, while other
code paths took the other. That said, their behavior is almost
identical:
- `index_for_x` computes the index behind the pixel offset, and returns
`None` if there's an overshoot
- `closest_index_for_x` computes the nearest index to the pixel offset,
taking into account whether the offset is over halfway through or not.
If there's an overshoot, it returns the length of the line.
Given these two behaviors, `closest_index_for_x` seems to be a more
useful API than `index_for_x`, and indeed the display map and other core
editor features use it extensively. So this PR is an experiment in
simply replacing one behavior with the other.
Release Notes:
- Improved the accuracy of mouse selections in Markdown
Closes https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/41407
This PR fixes the issues that caused #41407 to be reverted in #42008.
Namely that the action context didn't take into account if a snippet
could move backwards or forwards, and the action shared the same key
mapping as `editor::MoveToPreviousWordStart` and
`editor::MoveToNextWordEnd`.
I changed the default key mapping for the move to snippet tabstop to tab
and shift-tab to match the default behavior of other editors.
Release Notes:
- Editor: Add actions to move between snippet tabstop positions
Release Notes:
- N/A
When I was implementing Input, I often used `TextRun`, but `background`,
`underline` and `strikethrough` were often not used.
So make change to simplify it.
Release Notes:
Updated how clicking on multi-buffer headers works to provide better
control and prevent unexpected navigation:
Clicking the header now collapses/expands the file section instead of
opening the file.
Opening files can be done by clicking the filename or the "Open file"
button on the right side of the header.
Existing shortcuts continue to work: use the left chevron to collapse or
your keyboard shortcut to jump to the file
**Demo:**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dca9ccc5-bd98-416c-97af-43b4e4b2f903
Reverts zed-industries/zed#41466
This PR would add "in_snippet" context when there wasn't a completion
menu visible, causing some actions to not be hit.
Release Note:
- N/A
## Add relative line numbers on wrapped lines, take 2
This is a rework of https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/39268
that excludes
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/39268/commits/e7096d27a6463f6eb7c2a821637c5773b2460c10.
This commit introduced some line number rendering issues as described in
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/41422.
While @ConradIrwin suggested we try to pass in the buffer rows from the
calling method instead of the snapshot, that
appears to have had unintended consequences and I don't think the two
calculations were intended to do the same thing. Hence, this PR has
removed those changes.
This PR also includes the migration fix originally done by @MrSubidubi
in https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/41351.
## Original PR description and release notes.
**Problem:** Current relative line numbering creates a mismatch with
vim-style navigation when soft wrap is enabled. Users must mentally
calculate whether target lines are wrapped segments or logical lines,
making `<n>j/k` navigation unreliable and cognitively demanding.
**How things work today:**
- Real line navigation (`j/k` moves by logical lines): Requires
determining if visible lines are wrapped segments before jumping. Can't
jump to wrapped lines directly.
- Display line navigation (`j/k` moves by display rows): Line numbers
don't correspond to actual row distances for multi-line jumps.
**Proposed solution:** Count and number each display line (including
wrapped segments) for relative numbering. This creates direct
visual-to-navigational correspondence, where the relative number shown
always matches the `<n>j/k` distance needed.
**Benefits:**
- Eliminates mental overhead of distinguishing wrapped vs. logical lines
- Makes relative line numbers consistently actionable regardless of wrap
state
- Preserves intuitive "what you see is what you navigate" principle
- Maintains vim workflow efficiency in narrow window scenarios
Also explained and discussed in
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/discussions/25733.
Release Notes:
- Added support for counting wrapped lines as relative lines and for
displaying line numbers for wrapped segments. Changes
`relative_line_numbers` from a boolean to an enum: `enabled`,
`disabled`, or `wrapped`.
Noticed this whilst testing the Docker debugger. I randomly scrolled the
console off screen and was confused briefly as to why this was the case.
Release Notes:
- The debugger query console will no longer needlessly overscroll.
Closes#41407
This solves a problem where users couldn't navigate between snippet
tabstops while the completion menu was open.
I named the action {Next, Previous}SnippetTabstop instead of Placeholder
to be more inline with the LSP spec naming convention and our codebase
names.
Release Notes:
- Editor: Add actions to move between snippet tabstop positions
This happens quite often with cargo based diagnostics which may spawn
several lines (sometimes the entire screen), forcing the user to scroll
up to the start of the diagnostic just to see the hover message is not
great.
Release Notes:
- Fixed diagnostics hovers not working if the diagnostic spans out of
view
Closes#41422
This completely broke line numbering as described in the linked issue
and scrolling up does not have the correct numbers any more.
Release Notes:
- NOTE: The `relative_line_numbers` change
(https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/39268) was reverted and did
not make the release cut!
**Problem:** Current relative line numbering creates a mismatch with
vim-style navigation when soft wrap is enabled. Users must mentally
calculate whether target lines are wrapped segments or logical lines,
making `<n>j/k` navigation unreliable and cognitively demanding.
**How things work today:**
- Real line navigation (`j/k` moves by logical lines): Requires
determining if visible lines are wrapped segments before jumping. Can't
jump to wrapped lines directly.
- Display line navigation (`j/k` moves by display rows): Line numbers
don't correspond to actual row distances for multi-line jumps.
**Proposed solution:** Count and number each display line (including
wrapped segments) for relative numbering. This creates direct
visual-to-navigational correspondence where the relative number shown
always matches the `<n>j/k` distance needed.
**Benefits:**
- Eliminates mental overhead of distinguishing wrapped vs. logical lines
- Makes relative line numbers consistently actionable regardless of wrap
state
- Preserves intuitive "what you see is what you navigate" principle
- Maintains vim workflow efficiency in narrow window scenarios
Also explained an discussed in
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/discussions/25733.
Release Notes:
Release Notes:
- Added support for counting wrapped lines as relative lines and for
displaying line numbers for wrapped segments. Changes
`relative_line_numbers` from a boolean to an enum: `enabled`,
`disabled`, or `wrapped`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
Closes#39172
This refactors when we resolve UI keybindings in an effort to reduce
flickering whilst painting these: Previously, we would always resolve
these upon creating the binding. This could lead to cases where the
corresponding context was not yet available and no binding could be
resolved, even if the binding was then available on the next presented
frame. Following that, on the next rerender of whatever requested this
keybinding, the keybind for that context would then be found, we would
render that and then also win a layout shift in that process, as we went
from nothing rendered to something rendered between these frames.
With these changes, this now happens less often, because we only look
for the keybinding once the context can actually be resolved in the
window.
| Before | After |
| --- | --- |
|
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/adebf8ac-217d-4c7f-ae5a-bab3aa0b0ee8
|
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/70a82b4b-488f-4a9f-94d7-b6d0a49aada9
|
Also reduced cloning in the keymap editor in this process, since that
requiered changing due to this anyway.
Release Notes:
- Fixed some cases where keybinds would appear with a slight delay,
causing a flicker in the process
Release Notes:
- Improved text color in LSP document color highlight.
----
Because highlight ranges are implemented using a paint background,
there's no way to control the text color.
I've been thinking about this problem for a long time, want to solve it.
~~Today, I come up with a new idea. Re-rendering the document color text
at the top should solve this problem.~~
#### Update 10/6:
> The previous version is not good, when we have soft wrap text, that
version will not work correct.
Now use exists `bg_segments_per_row` feature to fix text color.
## Before
<img width="563" height="540" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/99722253-0cab-4d2a-a5d1-7f28393bcaed"
/>
## After
<img width="544" height="527" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a1bf6cdb-0e9c-435d-b14a-6ee9159a63d9"
/>
This fixes an issue where we would search for the hovered diff hunk
based on the mouse hit test computed during (or prior) editor paint
instead of the mouse hit test computed prior to the mouse event
invocation.
That in turn could lead to cases where moving the mouse from the editor
to the project panel and then clicking a file shortly after would expand
a diff hunk when actually nothing should happen in that case.
Release Notes:
- Fixed an issue where diff hunks would sometimes erroneously toggle
upon mouse clicks.
Re-applies https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/30840
This PR re-applies the initial
[PR](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/30840). As it was closed
because it was hard to land, because of the many conflicts. This PR
re-applies the changes for it.
In several cases we were creating multiple display_map
snapshots within the same root-level function call.
Creating a display_map snapshot is quite slow, and in some
cases we were creating the snapshot multiple times.
Release Notes:
- N/A
`MultiBuffer::anchor_in_excerpt` currently just wraps the given text
anchor in a multibuffer anchor. This allows one to get a multibuffer
anchor that points outside its excerpt which is basically never what one
wants. This PR now does a bounds check and returns `None` if the given
text anchor is not within the bounds of the excerpt.
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <kirill@zed.dev>
Currently when extending a selection using shift-click, the selection
granularity (or `SelectMode`) is based on the click count when extending
the selection, not on the click count of the initial selection. For
example, selecting a word with double-click followed by shift-click uses
a character granularity:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/13c78bb9-9c31-45d4-97de-99c30c7425a7
This PR changes this behavior to be more in line with other editors that
I'm familiar with by preserving the granularity of the initial selection
(unless the extension has a higher click count, i.e. the behavior of a
single click selection by a shift-double-click extension is unchanged):
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/92e69e95-7ea2-4f76-b0a4-e4b9efa1947b
Release Notes:
- Extending a selection using shift-click now preserves the
character/word/line granularity of the initial selection
---------
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukas@zed.dev>
Repro:
- Open a multibuffer
- Click on a line number to jump to the corresponding file
- Click the back button
- Click the forward button, nothing happens
- Click the forward button again, now it works
Double clicking the code to jump to the file (with
`"double_click_in_multibuffer": "open"`) doesn't exhibit this bug, so I
just changed the logic when clicking on a line number in a multibuffer
to match that behavior.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/31c0d64d-fdb8-44d6-b0f3-a337ca53de30
Release Notes:
- Fixed bug that could cause navigation to break when clicking on a line
number in a multibuffer
## Description
Fixes#39376
Add individual FoldAtLevel1-9 actions so users can find fold commands in
the command palette while keeping existing keybindings.
Migrating user keymaps is necessary to have the keybinds show in the command palette.
Closes#39376
### Changes
- `crates/editor/src/actions.rs` - Added FoldAtLevel1-9 action structs
- `crates/editor/src/editor.rs` - Implemented fold_at_level_1-9 handler
methods
- `crates/editor/src/element.rs` - Registered new actions
- `assets/keymaps/*.json` - Updated keybindings to use new individual
actions
### Other Approaches considered
- Adding #[serde(default)] to existing FoldAtLevel(u32) - wouldn't make
it discoverable
- Creating a single action with enumerated variants - idk about this
that well.
### Release Notes
Release Notes:
- Added Fold At Level 1-9 actions to the command palette
---------
Co-authored-by: HactarCE <6060305+HactarCE@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Fixes an issue where font features (like ligatures) were not applied to
text under the vim block cursor. The cursor would inherit the font
family from the character at the cursor
position, but would use default font features instead of the editor's
configured font features.
## Changes
- Make the font mutable when rendering the vim block cursor
- Apply the editor's text style font features to the cursor font
This ensures that text under the block cursor renders with the same
visual appearance as the rest of the editor content.
Closes#39471
Release Notes:
- Fixed vim block cursor not respecting font features (like ligatures)
Danilo Leal
Xiaobo LiuandDanilo Leal
Finn Evers
Lukas Wirth
shaik-zeeshanandFinn Evers
Smit Barmase
Kirill Bulatov
Matt Miller
Anthony EidandRemco Smits
Mikayla Maki
LibonandDanilo Leal
Jason Lee
Thomas Heartman
Josh Piasecki
Julia Ryan
localccandJohn Tur
Munish MummadiandHactarCE
Ratazzi