Martin PoolandMateusz Mikuła 10b99c6f55 RFC: Recommend and enable using Wild rather than Mold on Linux for local builds (#37717)
# Summary 

Today, Zed uses Mold on Linux, but Wild can be significantly faster. 

On my machine, Wild is 14% faster at a whole-tree clean build, 20%
faster on an incremental build with a minimal change, and makes no
measurable effect on runtime performance of tests.

However, Wild's page says it's not yet ready for production, so it seems
to early to switch for production and CI builds.

This PR keeps using Mold in CI and lets developers choose in their own
config what linker to use. (The downside of this is that after landing
this change, developers will have to do some local config or it will
fall back to the default linker which may be slower.)

[Wild 0.6 is out, and their announcement has some
benchmarks](https://davidlattimore.github.io/posts/2025/09/23/wild-update-0.6.0.html).

cc @davidlattimore from Wild, just fyi

# Tasks

- [x] Measure Wild build, incremental build, and runtime performance in
different scenarios
- [x] Remove the Linux linker config from `.cargo/config.toml` in the
tree
- [x] Test rope benchmarks etc
- [x] Set the linker to Mold in CI 
- [x] Add instructions to use Wild or Mold into `linux.md`
- [x] Add a script to download Wild
- [x] Measure binary size
- [x] Recommend Wild from `scripts/linux`

# Benchmarks 

| | wild 0.6 (rust 1.89) | mold 2.37.1 (1.89) | lld (rust 1.90) | wild
advantage |
| -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| clean workspace build | 176s | 184s | 182s | 5% faster than mold |
| nextest run workspace after build | 137s | 142s | 137s | in the noise?
|
| incremental rebuild | 3.9s | 5.0s | 6.6s | 22% faster than mold | 

I didn't observe any apparent significant change in runtime performance
or binary size, or in the in-tree microbenchmarks.

Release Notes:

- N/A

---------

Co-authored-by: Mateusz Mikuła <oss@mateuszmikula.dev>
2025-09-25 10:35:13 +02:00
2025-09-10 22:48:33 +02:00
2025-09-23 16:49:45 +00:00
2025-09-24 16:03:08 +00:00
2025-05-17 12:34:42 +00:00
2025-09-16 21:58:40 +00:00
2025-09-24 15:45:14 +00:00
2025-04-24 21:29:33 +00:00
2025-03-10 01:06:11 -07:00
2025-09-22 14:36:10 -07:00
2024-09-30 17:46:21 -04:00
2025-09-22 14:36:10 -07:00
2025-02-04 09:02:59 -05:00
2025-02-04 09:02:59 -05:00
2024-08-08 17:21:38 -07:00
2025-07-29 14:24:10 -04:00
2025-09-22 14:36:10 -07:00
2025-03-10 01:06:11 -07:00

Zed

Zed CI

Welcome to Zed, a high-performance, multiplayer code editor from the creators of Atom and Tree-sitter.


Installation

On macOS and Linux you can download Zed directly or install Zed via your local package manager.

Other platforms are not yet available:

Developing Zed

Contributing

See CONTRIBUTING.md for ways you can contribute to Zed.

Also... we're hiring! Check out our jobs page for open roles.

Licensing

License information for third party dependencies must be correctly provided for CI to pass.

We use cargo-about to automatically comply with open source licenses. If CI is failing, check the following:

  • Is it showing a no license specified error for a crate you've created? If so, add publish = false under [package] in your crate's Cargo.toml.
  • Is the error failed to satisfy license requirements for a dependency? If so, first determine what license the project has and whether this system is sufficient to comply with this license's requirements. If you're unsure, ask a lawyer. Once you've verified that this system is acceptable add the license's SPDX identifier to the accepted array in script/licenses/zed-licenses.toml.
  • Is cargo-about unable to find the license for a dependency? If so, add a clarification field at the end of script/licenses/zed-licenses.toml, as specified in the cargo-about book.
S
Description
GPUI – Community Edition maintained by Oak Team
https://gpui-ce.github.io/
Readme
257 MiB
Languages
Rust 95.5%
WGSL 1.2%
Metal 1.1%
HLSL 1.1%
Python 0.7%
Other 0.3%