On most platforms, things were working correctly, but had the wrong
type. On X11, there were some problems with window and display size
calculations.
Release Notes:
- Fixed issues with window positioning on X11
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mikayla <mikayla@zed.dev>
Sharing a project displays a notification (window) on every screen.
Previously there was an issue with the positioning of windows on all
screens except the primary screen.
As you can see here:
Now:
@mikayla-maki and I also decided to refactor the `WindowOptions` a bit.
Previously you could specify bounds which controlled the positioning and
size of the window in the global coordinate space, while also providing
a display id (which screen to show the window on). This can lead to
unusual behavior because you could theoretically specify a global bound
which does not even belong to the display id which was provided.
Therefore we changed the api to this:
```rust
struct WindowOptions {
/// The bounds of the window in screen coordinates
/// None -> inherit, Some(bounds) -> set bounds.
pub bounds: Option<Bounds<DevicePixels>>,
/// The display to create the window on, if this is None,
/// the window will be created on the main display
pub display_id: Option<DisplayId>,
}
```
This lets you specify a display id, which maps to the screen where the
window should be created and bounds relative to the upper left of the
screen.
Release Notes:
- Fixed positioning of popup windows (e.g. when sharing a project) when
using multiple external displays.
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
CGDisplayBounds returns data in "global display coordinates" (which are
the same as Zed's coordinates), different from the NS APIs which use
"screen coordinates" (which have the Y axis inverted)
Also remove some transmutes while we're at it
According to Chromium source, `NSScreen::screens` should always get us
one display.
We made this change because we ran into panics caused by the previous
`unwrap()` when `CGGetActiveDisplayList` might return an empty list.
Previously we called CGGetActiveDisplayList twice: once to get the
number of displays and then to get the displays.
We saw a panic due to no displays being returned here. As a first
attempt to fix the panic, we're reducing the amount of calls to
CGGetActiveDisplayList and just do one with the trade-off being that we
pre-allocate 32 pointers in a Vec.
I essentially went through the publicly exported items and marked these
that are e.g. leaky reexports as pub(crate). I expect that'd be done on
Tuesday anyways.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Bennet Bo FennerandConrad Irwin
Thorsten Ball
Marshall Bowers
Piotr Osiewicz