I found that there may be some minor problems here, in editor.edit may
be more dependent on the order of operations, if the same set of
operations, different execution orders may lead to some different
results, so maybe we need to use BTreeSet instead of HashSet, because
HashSet may not be able to ensure that the same set of data order is
consistent, but maybe my worries are too much
Release notes:
- N/A
I'm not sure how compliant you're aiming to be with vim, but the `f`
behavior is more useful when it can search on multiple lines instead of
a single one, so I'd like to propose this change.
This change is quite frequent in vim/neovim as a plugin (e.g.
[clever-f](https://github.com/VSCodeVim/Vim),
[improved-ft](https://github.com/backdround/improved-ft.nvim), etc), and
in other vim emulations (e.g.
[vscode-vim](https://github.com/VSCodeVim/Vim)).
Release Notes:
- vim: Added a setting to control default clipboard behaviour. `{"vim":
{"use_system_clipboard": "never"}}` disables writing to the clipboard.
`"on_yank"` writes to the system clipboard only on yank, and `"always"`
preserves the current behavior. ([#4390
](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/4390))
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
Before this change up and down were in display co-ordinates, after this
change they are in fold coordinates (which matches the vim behaviour).
To make this work without causing usabliity problems, a bunch of extra
keyboard shortcuts now work:
- vim: `z {o,c}` to open,close a fold
- vim: `z f` to fold current visual selection
- vim: `g {j,k,up,down}` to move up/down a display line
- vim: `g {0,^,$,home,end}` to get to start/end of a display line
Fixes: zed-industries/community#1562
- vim: support P for paste before
- vim: support P in visual mode for paste without overriding clipboard
- vim: fix position when using `p` on text copied outside zed
- vim: fix indentation when using `p` on text copied from zed
These primarily happen when first entering visual mode, but can also
be created with objects like `vi{`.
Along the way fix the way ranges like `vi{` are selected to be more
similar to nvim.
This previously enabled things like `d g g` to work, but we can
fix that instead by not clearing out pending vim state on change.
Either way, it is unnecessary and causes some user-confusion
(zed-industries/community#176), so remove this code for now; and use
comments to organize the file a bit instead.
After #2641 we noticed that scrolling didn't take a count parameter.
The PageDown/PageUp logic was also broken by an additional -1 (for both
vim mode and not).