* Use a single row, instead of centering the search bar within a double-row toolbar.
* Search query controls on the left, navigation on the right
* Semantic is the final mode, for greater stability between buffer and project search.
* Prevent query editor from moving when toggling path filters
Rather than adding primary toolbar item that renders as empty,
don't add an item at all. This prevents spurious spacing from
being added after other primary toolbar items.
See Linear description for the full explanation of the issue. This PR is
mostly a mechanical change, except for the one case where we do pass in
an explicit `next_id` instead of `model_id` in project.rs.
Release Notes:
- Fixed a bug where some results were not reported in project search in
presence of unnamed buffers.
Miltibuffer emits edit events even if it only got an excerpt
added/removed/etc.
Separate buffer edits and trigger hint invalidation refresh for them
only, also trigger hint new lines refresh on excerpt addition events.
This PR adds the wiring to both the server and the client for sending
and receiving individual feature flags, as well as a client side API for
convenient access to these feature flags.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This fixes a bug where text moved up and down by one pixel in the buffer
search query editor, while typing.
Release notes:
* Fixed a bug where editors didn't auto-scroll when typing if all
cursors could not fit within the viewport.
This is the first batch of improvements to current project search. There
are few things we can do better still, but I want to get this out in
next Preview.
Most of the slowness at this point seems to stem from updating UI too
often.
Release Notes:
- Improved project search by making it report results sooner.
---------
Co-authored-by: Julia Risley <julia@zed.dev>
* Scroll to the newest cursor if all cursors can't fit in the viewport.
* Refuse to layout an editor less tall than one line height.
Co-authored-by: Nathan <nathan@zed.dev>
This isn't ready to go - I'm opening a PR to ask for some advice. When
activating a python virtual environment, the typical command used is
`source path_to_venv/bin/activate`. The problem is, the activatate
script isn't portable to all shells, so some additional scripts are
bundled in the env, for example, `activate.fish`. We don't have a good
way of knowing what shell we are in, in order to know what script to
run.
Julia gave the alternative of simply activating the virtual environment
while in the zsh context, before the user's custom shell is launched,
which I think does work, but because we activate the virtual environment
before we launch the custom shell, the shell isn't really aware that we
are in the virtual environment and it fails to display the information
in the prompt that is typically shown after activating.
Is there a clean way for us to know for a fact what shell is being ran,
so we know what script to run?
Check out the code comments below for more context.
---
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/assets/19867440/ddb76aaa-152b-4c93-a513-3cd580b7c40f
I've used Zed to write Python scripts, but working on an actual project
has really magnified where Python dev is falling short. A huge
quality-of-life thing we can do is provide a setting to automaticaly
search for and activate virtual environments when found, when terminals
are created. Manually starting these up in every terminal instance is
such a drag.
A few quirks:
- We don't have a way of knowing if the prompt is ready before we try
run the command, which means we see the text inserted at the top of the
terminal and on the prompt - I dont think this should be a blocker
though.
- If a user has multiple python projects with mutliple virtual
environments, we only detect and activate the first one, since can't
really make any assumptions about which one to activate. I dont think
this should be a blocker either, as I think most users will have a
single project open in Zed.
Release Notes:
- Added a `detect_venv` setting for the terminal. When configured, the
Zed terminal will automatically activate Python virtual environments on
terminal creation.
In visual mode when your selection ends with a newline we show the
cursor at the end of the previous line (not the start of the current
line). We had only been accounting for this if the cursor was on-screen.
This way, only the visible part gets frequently queried on typing (and
hint /refresh requests that follow), with queries for invisible ranges
cancelled eagerly.
Often, hint ranges are separated by a single '<` char as in
`Option<Vec<u32>>`. When moving the caret from left to right, avoid
inclusive ranges to faster update the matching hint underline.
Max Brunsfeld
Piotr Osiewicz
Kirill Bulatov
Mikayla Maki
Conrad Irwin
Joseph T. Lyons
