This adds a new action to the editor: `editor: toggle git blame`. When
used it turns on a sidebar containing `git blame` information for the
currently open buffer.
The git blame information is updated when the buffer changes. It handles
additions, deletions, modifications, changes to the underlying git data
(new commits, changed commits, ...), file saves. It also handles folding
and wrapping lines correctly.
When the user hovers over a commit, a tooltip displays information for
the commit that introduced the line. If the repository has a remote with
the name `origin` configured, then clicking on a blame entry opens the
permalink to the commit on the code host.
Users can right-click on a blame entry to get a context menu which
allows them to copy the SHA of the commit.
The feature also works on shared projects, e.g. when collaborating a
peer can request `git blame` data.
As of this PR, Zed now comes bundled with a `git` binary so that users
don't have to have `git` installed locally to use this feature.
### Screenshots



### TODOs
- [x] Bundling `git` binary
### Release Notes
Release Notes:
- Added `editor: toggle git blame` command that toggles a sidebar with
git blame information for the current buffer.
---------
Co-authored-by: Antonio <antonio@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Piotr <piotr@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Bennet <bennetbo@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Mikayla <mikayla@zed.dev>
Hopefully this makes it a bit easier for new contributors to dive into
the codebase :)
Release Notes:
- Improved documentation for many core editor types
---------
Co-authored-by: Nathan Sobo <nathan@zed.dev>
* Filter out queries for outdated buffers just before hint tasks spawn:
multicared edits might empit standalone events simultaneously
* Only spawn inlay update tasks for visible buffers with corresponding
language
* Do not spawn tasks for local projects' buffers without LSP servers
We were seeing non-deterministic behavior in randomized tests when
generating backtraces took enough time to cause transactions to group
in some cases, but not group in others.
Tests will need to explicitly opt into grouping if they want it by
setting the interval explicitly. We have tests in the text module that
currently test the history grouping explicitly, but I'm not sure
it's needed elsewhere.