Support relative line number on wrapped lines (#39268)

**Problem:** Current relative line numbering creates a mismatch with
vim-style navigation when soft wrap is enabled. Users must mentally
calculate whether target lines are wrapped segments or logical lines,
making `<n>j/k` navigation unreliable and cognitively demanding.

**How things work today:**
- Real line navigation (`j/k` moves by logical lines): Requires
determining if visible lines are wrapped segments before jumping. Can't
jump to wrapped lines directly.
- Display line navigation (`j/k` moves by display rows): Line numbers
don't correspond to actual row distances for multi-line jumps.

**Proposed solution:** Count and number each display line (including
wrapped segments) for relative numbering. This creates direct
visual-to-navigational correspondence where the relative number shown
always matches the `<n>j/k` distance needed.

**Benefits:**
- Eliminates mental overhead of distinguishing wrapped vs. logical lines
- Makes relative line numbers consistently actionable regardless of wrap
state
- Preserves intuitive "what you see is what you navigate" principle
- Maintains vim workflow efficiency in narrow window scenarios

Also explained an discussed in
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/discussions/25733.

Release Notes:

Release Notes:

- Added support for counting wrapped lines as relative lines and for
displaying line numbers for wrapped segments. Changes
`relative_line_numbers` from a boolean to an enum: `enabled`,
`disabled`, or `wrapped`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>

crates/multi_buffer/src/multi_buffer_tests.rs

@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ fn test_empty_singleton(cx: &mut App) {
             multibuffer_row: Some(MultiBufferRow(0)),
             diff_status: None,
             expand_info: None,
+            wrapped_buffer_row: None,
         }]
     );
 }
@@ -2432,6 +2433,8 @@ impl ReferenceMultibuffer {
                             buffer_id: region.buffer_id,
                             diff_status: region.status,
                             buffer_row,
+                            wrapped_buffer_row: None,
+
                             multibuffer_row: Some(MultiBufferRow(
                                 text[..ix].matches('\n').count() as u32
                             )),